Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
Evidence-based thinking and why it matters Views expressed may represent the views of the author and not necessarily those of CEBM as a group
CEBM
Professor Tom Jefferson is a tutor on the Complex Reviews module. He is also a Senior Fellow at the Centre
Read More
José Ordóñez-Mena is a Module Co-ordinator and tutor for Introduction to Study Design and Research Methods, and also teaches on
Dr Geoff Wong is a Clinical Research Fellow at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. He is Module
There are endless unreliable claims about the effects of treatments. To avoid being misled, people must think critically. Learning how
Dylan Collins
Imagine you are a 20-year old woman and you think you might have a urinary tract infection (UTI). You head
Academics have long been accused of intellectual isolation – locked away in Ivory Towers, unable to find a ‘lingua franca’
Guest
That school teachers receive better support from the EBM community, enabling them to take advantage of opportunities to teach EBM
Richard Bright’s paper of 1833, a series of case reports from his clinical practice, is thought to be the first
Making a phenomenal speech takes years of practice, knowledge gathering, and a good bit of confidence – but preparing for,
Kamal Mahtani
2016 October 2016 Lecture 1 Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine 2017 February 2017 Lecture 2 Critical Appraisal of Randomised Controlled Trials February 2017
Christmas Lists & New Years Resolutions: Improving the development, dissemination and implementation of research evidence for better health. Did you know
Carl Heneghan
Inside Britain’s Fertility Business BBC Panorama, 28th Nov 2016 Exclusive new research by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine shows a worrying
The main current meaning of rhetoric is “the art of using language effectively so as to persuade or influence others”
Ever tried to catch a jellyfish? Or squeeze a squid in your hand? Or wrestle with an octopus? You can’t
In my previous blog I discussed the booming popularity of propensity score methods, and the claims made for them by enthusiasts.
