Critical Appraisal tools

AppraisalCritical appraisal is the systematic evaluation of clinical research papers in order to establish:

  1. Does this study address a clearly focused question?
  2. Did the study use valid methods to address this question?
  3. Are the valid results of this study important?
  4. Are these valid, important results applicable to my patient or population?

If the answer to any of these questions is “no”, you can save yourself the trouble of reading the rest of it.

This section contains useful tools and downloads for the critical appraisal of different types of medical evidence. Example appraisal sheets are provided together with several helpful examples.

Critical Appraisal Worksheets

English

Chinese – Translated by Chung-Han Yang and Shih-Chieh Shao

German – Translated by Johannes Pohl and Martin Sadilek 

Lithuanian – Translated by Tumas Beinortas

Portuguese – Translated by Enderson Miranda and Luis Eduardo Fontes

Spanish – Translated by Ana Cristina Castro

See also:

Explanations & Examples

14 comments on “Critical Appraisal tools

  1. Pingback: Lunch & Learn: How to Critically Read a Joural Research Article | My Learning Journal

  2. Pingback: Yale Emergency Medicine Journal Club | YaleEM.org

  3. Pingback: Aspirin as DVT prophylaxis for high risk long-haul travellers | Michael Tam

  4. Pingback: Aspirin as DVT prophylaxis for high risk long-haul travellers – General Practice Unit @FairfieldHospital

  5. Pingback: EBM Corner: Evaluating the Evidence : Is There a Rigid Hierarchy? | Moko Apt

  6. Pingback: Bulletin for Evidence-Based Health Care Programme - CEBM

  7. Pingback: Why is it important to identify intimate partner violence during pregnancy? | The Blue Journal Club

  8. Pingback: Systematic Review – Part 1: Writing – Paramedic Researcher

  9. Pingback: Why Journal Club?... EBM versus the Tooth Fairy - INTENSIVE

  10. Pingback: What exactly is an RCT and is this one any good? - INTENSIVE

  11. Pingback: Global Intensive Care | What exactly is an RCT and is this one any good?

  12. Pingback: What you put in is what you get out... Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - INTENSIVE

  13. Pingback: Magic Yoghurt I | Bugs, not bollocks.

  14. Consider updating the RCT sheet, by adding under PICO, a suggestion to verify the original outcome at trial registration and that registration occurred before the first patient was enrolled. For an example of trial registration affecting the conclusion of a practice guideline, see https://pubmed.gov/29204613

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Checkbox GDPR is required

*

I agree


Notice: Undefined index: click_tracking in /home/wwwcebm/public_html/wp-content/plugins/social-warfare/functions/frontend-output/SWP_Script.php on line 170